Abandoned Books

Reviews of books and authors not much discussed on the web.

Name:
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Lawrence Schoover: THE BURNISHED BLADE

Lawrence Schoonover – THE BURNISHED BLADE (1948)

The next big push after Doyle will be a bunch of once-bestselling, now fairly forgotten authors of historical fiction. This was a genre that was once so associated with “bestseller” that when Chandler needed to create a bestselling writer for THE LONG GOODBYE he made him a historical fiction writer.

We'll be looking at Samuel Shellabarger (CAPTAIN FROM CASTILLE, PRINCE OF FOXES, LORD VANITY); Thomas Costain (probably THE BLACK ROSE)' Frank Yerby (THE GOLDEN HAWK, ODOR OF SANCTITY, either FOXES OF HARROW or JUDAS MY BROTHER, depends on what I can find); one of the big female writers of the era (either Kathleen Winsor's FOREVER AMBER or Anya Seton's DRAGONWYCK, probably DRAGONWYCK if I can find it inexpensively), and the most lionized of the bunch, Kenneth Roberts (NORTHWEST PASSAGE, ARUNDEL, RABBLE IN ARMS). I don't know if I'll do a whole big post on any of these just yet, I don't know if the subject allows for it, although Yerby is an interesting writer to look at and Roberts maybe, just by virtue of his success.

But anyway, Schoonover. If you read online reviews of this book (at Amazon, or wherever) you'll read a lot of indications that essentially it's bowdlerized, that the publication date indicates Schoonover couldn't be as, er, “frank” about the era as he might've wanted.

Eh. Yeah, there's no graphic sex scenes or disembowelment scenes, if that's what you mean, but I wouldn't exactly say the book wasn't, you know, “up to speed”, like all you crazy kids say nowadays. There's a graphic bit about the hero's parents being burned in a fire, an unstated, but very real bit where he gets laid by a slut, a reference to what we'd call now a serial killer (and the implication that he's also a pedophile), and the whole tone in general is sort of hand-me-down hardboiled, that is, it has a feel of light cynicism about it all (the tone taken toward nobility, religious authorities, etc.). I mean, given it's era and all, it doesn't feel to me especially cloistered.

The other criticism I've read of this book is that it's very pulpy, and there you might have something, although I think it's useful to step back and explain what you mean by it. It is very pulpily plotted, if that's what you mean, although if you say that you're relying on a very limited definition of “pulp” that not many people use anymore. That is, the classic pulp “plot” is “this happened, and then this, and then this, and then this” a string of beads continued until the somewhat arbitrary conclusion. (A lot of Burroughs, particularly the Tarzan books, are plotted this way.) .

There's no denying that this kind of rough-and-ready storytelling is a hallmark of “pulp plotting”, although you can just as easily find complete fully formed novels in the “pulp” world (just about all of the Gold Medal guys, for instance), as well as a lot string of beads plots in middlebrow books aiming for the big time (THE CARDINAL, say.)

It's not like it's restricted to pulp fiction and so hardly a characteristic of it. Maybe it'd just be better to call it “a rough form of plotting” and leave it like that.

The other big aspect to pulp writing, it seems to me, is that the incidents have to be evocative, they have to be sensational and capture the reader's interest straight out. Like Sax Rohmer, say. Even Rohmer's best books are full of nonsense – killer insects, killer fungus, mind control, evil black sabbaths in the pyramids at midnight, etc. This seems to me to be a primary aspect of pulp fiction, the constant attempt to keep the reader entertained. Such is not the case with Schoonover, this is a pretty tepid book for a'that, like a lot of historical romances it's a big tease, a lot “happens” but not a lot actually happens, the actual number of incidents in the damn thing is quite low, and while you might grab a copy thinking you're gonna get a lot of adventure, you're not. I hate to tell you this, but you're not.

So not recommended, although I have hopes that the movie version is better. Because they'd, like, put some exciting scenes in it.

Other things I've been reading:

Edgar Wallace – THE LAW OF THE FOUR JUST MEN (1921) – I like Wallace, and have been reading a fair amount of him lately, currently the Four Just Men series. The first remains the best, and is a genuine oddity, if it's anything it's sort of a philosophical story couched in thriller terms. It's a classic and highly recommended. THE COUNCIL OF THE JUST is not as good but is not bad, these guys become relatively straightforward vigilante heroes ala Sapper's THE BLACK GANG, albeit not as well told. I don't remember much about THE JUST MEN OF CORDOVA, except that it wasn't all that good and that Wallace obviously liked Spain.

And then there's this one – this is a collection of short stories, about half of them recast the remaining just men as amateur private detectives, with middling success (this is not a strong suit of Wallace's) and half of them in the older vigilante form (which work much better, with a lot of “biter bit” sort of payoffs). I think Wallace is actually better in other venues, but LAW is not bad, and worth reading for anyone with a tolerance for this sort of stuff.

Guy Boothby – A BID FOR FORTUNE (aka ENTER DR NIKOLA) (1895) – I really wanted to like this, as the setup – early decadent supervillain ala Fu Manchu, Victorian themes, wildness, globe hopping, is pretty much crack to me. He even has a pet cat he has unnatural relations with. (I kid.)

This is really almost outrageously bad, though, almost written at a rough draft level. Stuff that you would never countenance today – outrageous coincidences, longwinded digressions, a lack of payoff, a lack of suspense, convenient plotting, you name it – is countenanced here because, well, it's old, man, huh?

I find this fandom worship disconcerting and disheartening: I have a taste for this genre because I like it but looking to the past doesn't relieve you of your critical precepts, my friends, and if you excuse the manifold faults of FORTUNE because you just like the idea of this kind of stuff, then you're not a true admirer of the work, you're just a fetishist.

If the work can't stand up today it's not good. No amount of excuse-making will change that salient fact.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Brokersring.com - Learn how to turn $500 into $5,000 in a month!

[url=http://www.brokersring.com/]Make Money Online[/url] - The Secret Reveled with Binary Option

Binary Options is the way to [url=http://www.brokersring.com/]make money[/url] securely online

11:15 AM  
Blogger Shijun Lin said...

shijun 5.26
ray-ban sunglasses
jordan 4 retro
christian louboutin sale
michael kors outlet
cheap oakleys
michael kors
coach outlet
true religion sale
fitflop outlet
louis vuitton handbags
adidas wings
mont blanc
michael kors
michael kors outlet
air jordans
oakley sunglasses discount
coach outlet
christian louboutin
timberland outlet
oakley sunglasses
chi hair strighteners
louis vuitton
burberry handbags
concord 11s
oakley sunglass
coach factory
burberry
kobe bryant shoes for kids
ghd
air max 95
ray ban wayfarer
jordan shoes
coach outlet
cheap oakleys
ray ban outlet
jordan 11
christian louboutin
michael kors outlet
michael kors canada
louis vuitton purses

9:25 PM  
Blogger dong dong said...

201579dongdong
oakley sunglasses
fendi bags
jordan 11 low
jordan 9
michael kors outlet
nfl jerseys
celine
chanel handbags
coach factory outlet
oakley sunglasses wholesale
tory burch outlet online
lebron james basketball shoes
christian louboutin
louis vuitton
lebron james shoes
michael kors watches
cheap air max
christian louboutin shoes
longchamp bags
soccer jerseys
oakley sunglasses wholesale
christian louboutin sale
true religion
ray bans
michael kors outlet online sale
coach outlet
cheap toms
prada shoes
oakley sunglasses cheap
longchamp outlet
coach factory
www.louisvuitton.com
jordan 4
cheap jerseys
ray ban sunglass
jordan 8
ralph lauren
michael kors outlet

9:54 PM  
Blogger Lin Shijun said...

shijun 7.11
coach outlet
kevin durant shoes 2015
michael kors outlet online
cheap beats by dre
concord 11
louboutin
ray ban outlet
soccer shoes
hollister clothing store
replica watches
christian louboutin outlet
gucci outlet
abercrombie outlet
louis vuitton handbags
lululemon outlet
michael kors
michael kors outlet
michael kors uk
coach factory outlet
toms canada
cheap toms
air max uk
louis vuitton handbags uk
jordan retro 5
ray ban sungalsses
fitflop outlet
jordan retro 11
louis vuitton outlet
air max 2015
ray-ban sunglasses
christian louboutin sale
cheap oakleys
coach outlet online
lebron 12
christian louboutin shoes
adidas wings
birkin bags
kobe 8
coach outlet online
cheap oakley sunglasses

9:46 PM  
Blogger Meiqing Xu said...

15721meiqing
tory burch outlet
louis vuitton outlet
ray ban sungalsses
louis vuitton online shop
air jordans
oakley sunglasses
adidas running shoes
michael kors outlet
ray ban sunglasses outlet
michael kors
coach outlet online
coach outlet
longchamp handbags
air jordan retro
ray ban sunglasses
jordan 11
ray ban sunglasses
christian louboutin sale
dior handbags
michael kors outlet online
true religion
michael kors outlet
mont blanc legend
ralph lauren polo shirts
kate spade handbags
christian louboutin shoes
burberry outlet online
tods shoes
gucci shoes
abercrombie and fitch new york
fitflop footwear
longchamp bags
fitflops clearance
fitflops
celine
mont blanc
cheap jerseys
ray ban sunglasses uk
michael kors purse
louis vuitton handbags

10:06 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home